Homework: Autobiography Analysis using APPARTS
Due: Friday 9/3
Worth: 10 points
In class today we discussed different kinds of sources and what we need to keep in mind when examining these sources in order to understand the truth of what really happened.
To do so throughout the year, we will be using the APPARTS process. This process serves as a guide for considering whether a source is reliable.
Key Take-Aways:
Everyone has bias. Look for it in all sources.
Bias can be seen in sources through exaggeration, lying, information included or left out, or any type of persuasion or argument.
Many secondary sources can also be primary sources, depending on how you use them.
Primary sources are not necessarily more accurate, in fact they can sometimes skew history quite a bit because they come from one person’s perspective (or several people). They do, however, give you an insight into what people were thinking, which can be used to draw very meaningful conclusions when compared to information gathered from secondary sources.
Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary sources.
Textbooks contain bias. They leave out entire regions or peoples from the study of history. The authors can portray events in specific ways to give the impression they want to give.
Here is the APPARTS process summary. Feel free to ask any questions you have.
APPARTS
AUTHOR
Who created the source? What do you know about the author? What is the author’s point of view?
PLACE AND TIME
Where and when was the source produced? How might this affect the meaning of the source?
PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
Beyond information about the author and the context of its creation, what do you know that would help you further understand the primary source? For example, do you recognize any symbols and recall what they represent?
AUDIENCE
For whom was the source created and how might this affect the reliability of the source?
REASON
Why was this source created at the time it was produced?
THE MAIN IDEA
What point is the source trying to convey?
SIGNIFICANCE
Why is this source important? What inferences can you draw from this document? Ask yourself, “So what?” in relation to the question asked.